A New Theory on What Constitutes Dark Matter

The presence of dark matter in the universe is a recent theory that is based on the rotational velocities of the stars in galaxies, all of which appear to be moving at or near the same speed. This does not conform to Newton's gravitational theory. The presence of some sort of unseen matter permeating the universe can presumably account for this phenomenon. Hence the recent proposition that "Dark Matter" must exist throughout the universe.

Is dark matter electromagnetic in nature? The earlier theories about electromagnetic field waves were based on the presence of an ether in the universe. Is the ether dark matter? Perhaps. Here is a link to a website that presents a short history about the ether theories. The most recent theory is a particle theory in which the dark matter is believed to consist of Higgs Bosons , which are particles and therefore fit in with the theories of Quantum Mechanics. They believe that they have found the "shadow" of a Higgs Boson, which raises new questions. How is it possible for particles, which exceed all others in amount, block radiation and be easy to find? Wouldn't this absorption heat up the entire universe? Is absolute zero not absolutely zero? How is it that all other forms of radiation are not blocked in a vacuum? Isn't this a rather shallow theory? But then, that is all they have to work with right now. It is a hypothetical particle based on hypothetical assumptions. They are neglecting the basic physics of a subject which I have spent many years of investigation, working all of the basic equations of physics against know measurements and using this information to solve several of the fundamental mysteries of science.

Is there an aether in the universe? Does that aether consist of Higgs Bosons? Some say that Einstein claimed that there is no such thing as an aether. Although the ether theory was never disproved, present day physics organizations had no longer supported the concept of an ether in the universe. However, I concluded that the bending of the field waves must be caused by something (If you can solve this Puzzle puzzle, you can prove to yourself that the field waves of moving electric charges must bend). I wrote my first book on the solution to the mystery of gravity back in 1997. The bending of electromagnetic field waves tends to support this ether theory, and also dark matter theory. Perhaps the most compelling fact supporting the existence of dark matter is the substance of the aether which is represented by the electric and magnetic constants e and u that seem to exist everywhere in the universe. The aether does have electromagnetic properties (permeability and permittivity), from which Maxwell deduced the speed of light. All matter has these properties. Another strong argument for this substance appears at the end of this page. However, not all of this measured data yet supports the Higgs Boson theory, although it does have some merit and deserves to be considered (but is it worth the billions of dollars spent in investigating it?)

The hydrogen atom is electromagnetic since it consists of just two moving electric charges, and it forms the basis of most of the matter throughout the universe. The investigation of the dynamic electromagnetic field of the atom was begun 22 years ago. This was followed by five books on the subject, the first of which was "The Secret of Gravity" (published in 1997). In this book, an electromagnetic field model of the hydrogen atom was constructed, which led to the solution to the secret of the source of the gravitational force. He concluded that everything in the universe is electrical. Further investigations led to the publishing of "The Electric Atom" in early 1999 (out of print) and "Secrets of the Atom" in late 1999. In these books, he presented solid evidence that electromagnetic field waves bend as their transverse velocity exceeds the speed of light. While this might appear to contradict other well known theories, this is not the case due to the asymmetric vector components of the field wave (which were pictured graphically in the book). Electromagnetic waves do not propagate spherically, and yet the radial velocity reaches the limit of the speed of light in the far field while the transverse velocity is unlimited!

Is space filled with tiny particles, as is presently assumed, or are they waves, stronger than steel as Newton believed? Dr. Vlasak has proposed that dark matter may simply be the "Luminiferous Aether Theory" that was first proposed by Newton in 1704. His gravitation theory is partly based on transverse electromagnetic waves traveling faster than the speed of light. Newton, in his studies of the measurements of refraction, pictured "...an "Aethereal Medium" transmitting vibrations faster than light", which is in conformance with the picture of radiation that Dr. Vlasak has presented and as based on measurements of electromagnetic radiation. Refraction can produce the bending of light waves, which are also electromagnetic, just as is the case for electromagnetic waves of a dipole antenna. Vlasak's analysis of the rotating dipole of the hydrogen atom, which consists of a single electron and proton (electric dipole) spinning in space, also experiences a bending effect. In his fourth book, "Planck's Columbia Lectures", he analyzed the work of Planck who described his theory at Columbia University. Planck's description of the transverse properties of matter had certain correlations to the electromagnetic field wave asymmetry. In Chapter 10 of this book, the viscosity of space is determined (b = 1/c), which is an extremely small value that can also be written in electromagnetic terms.

Dr. Vlasak: "I strongly urge scientists to reconsider the ether as the dark matter of the universe in their investigations of the movements of the bodies within the galaxies. One of the greatest obstacles to the particle theory of dark matter is the principle of superpostion in which interfering waves pass directly through one another without absorption or change of any sort. It would be interesting to find out if my calculation of the viscosity of space fits the galaxy rotation model."