*THE
SCIENCE SITE*

*Revolutionary
New Scientific Theories*

*Quotes:*

*"I don't like it, and I'm
sorry I ever had anything to do with it."*-
Erwin Schrodinger
talking about quantum mechanics.

*"Anyone who
thinks they know quantum mechanics doesn't."*-
Richard Feynmann quote to a graduate physics student.

*"Quantum Mechanics
is certainly imposing, but an inner voice tell me it is not the real thing."*-
Albert Einstein (1926)

*"The special theory of relativity
owes its origin to Maxwell's Equations of the electromagnetic field." - *Albert
Einstein. Were Maxwell's equations sufficient? See radiation
paper.

These quotes serve to indicate that new and better methods of analysis of basic physics is needed.

* The price of this book"**Secrets of the Atom**"
published in 1999, went from $12.95 to as high as$426.70 in 2004 when it was
mistakenly listed as "out of print". A small number of copies are
still available.

"Could Einstein have gotten it wrong? "

Telegraph.co.uk" , (August 24, 2007), and "Photons flout the light speed limit"

New Scientist(17 August 2007) Evidence of speeds that are faster than the speed of light. Old News!See: "The Secret of Gravity".

Dark Matter Theory:

A new theory about Dark Matter has been conceived. More and more evidence is emerging that supports the idea that Dark Matter permeates the universe. The

new theory describes what constitutes dark matter. It was conceived utilizing Electromagnetic Field Theory. The space in whichdark matterexists is said to be getting smaller or making objects appear smaller.

*Planck's
Quantum Theory:*

Learn about Planck's Quantum Theory as he himself described it in a series of lectures at Columbia University in 1908. He used the electronic oscillator as the model of the atom.

Don't miss our Planck's Units page. See why gravitational force drops out of the equations!

Communications between atoms:5, 2006. 1:51 PM (Reuters).

To learn how the atom transmits and sends information, see "Secrets of the Atom" (Old News!1999), page 126 and Chap.XI.

QM problems?

**Did
**you see the NOVA TV program on Nov. 27?
Several physicists
stated that Quantum Mechanics has ** never been proven wrong**.
But then they cited the "Bohr Atom\" model as the basic element
of QM theory... a theory that does not fully conform to reality. It is a
theory that Bohr himself admitted is abstract. Why aren't you being told
how the Rydberg frequencies are generated? For
details, see NOVAScrewup.

Explore this site to find solutions to some of the great remaining mysteries of science!

The presentation of new and unique theories with proofs based on real world measurementssee our new mathematical art page and 2012 CiSE article presents a new electromagnetic SPICE model of the atom

Max Planck said that the atom can be analyzed as either an electronic device or its mechanical analog. In fact, his famous quantum theory is based on an electronic model of the atom. Quantum theory is based on the abstract Bohr electromagnetic model, but it has an orbit of unlimited size and is abstract. I have resolved this difficulty by constructing a new electromagnetic model of the atom, and the results have been presented in several publications. The orbital is in the form of a sphere, which resolves the Bohr problem and conforms to the Rydberg frequencies. The next step is to provide better methods of analysis in conformance with new measured data at the atom level, which I have just completed. Many other accomplishments have been made using this approach, which you may find rather interesting. It has been published here. There were, however, many steps in the development that cover the field electromagnetics, which you can explore through the links on this page.

Einstein believed that the greatest remaining mystery of science is the difference between

matterandfield. In his lectures at Columbia, he did some rather amazing things that every scientist should study. Planck stated that hisPrinciple of Least Actionmight be extended to resolve this problem. I have used a modern approach to the problem using the dipole antenna model for the field. The results of the analysis lead to the conclusion that Einstein's theory is flawed due to an incorrect assumption about radiating fields.These efforts took many years. My first atom model was revealed in my first book, The Secret of Gravit

y, in 1997. It is a new modern electronic model of the hydrogen atom, similar to that of Planck in his famous theory of radiation. The electronic model is different from the quantum method in that it is based on both electromagnetic and quantum properties. The force of gravity is shown to be anelectric differential forcethat is a small fraction of the electromagnetic forces of the atom. This theory is confirmed by correlation to real measurements.Can you derive Einstein's equation E = mc^2 ? There are some lengthy and questionable derivations on the Internet. I derived rather easily it in just one short page of my book, "Secrets of the Atom" (page 64), after I constructed a new electromagnetic model of the atom to derive its energy. A key factor was the Mesny electromagnetic radiation equations that date back to 1935 or earlier and have been thoroughly tested over many years. These equations were then expressed in terms of eigenvectors, which is perhaps a better method than that of the Casimir force for the three space vectors (x,y,z) individually. I also employed the Lorentz force and Newton's second law of motion. My method is relatively simple in comparison to the complex and confusing long drawn out mathematical derivations of quantum mechanics.

One of the most challenging problems in physics and science is the Bohr radius problem. Quantum Mechanics (a "particle" theory) was based on the Bohr hydrogen atom, an abstract electromagnetic model as Bohr himself admitted. In his model, the atom can reach

which we know is not possible. In spite of this anomaly, the Bohr atom does conform to measurements of coherent radiation from the hydrogen atom to a high degree. Although Bohr admitted that his model is abstract, some physicists actually claimed to have detected such atoms! The present Quantum Mechanics atom model is based on anany size,energyshellin order to avoid this orbit problem, so it cannot predict orbits (only inexact probable orbitals). In thenew field theorypresented here, not only is the size problem resolved, the preciseelectronorbitis also determined. This is a fundamental problem that had neverbefore been solved.Recent evidence shows that light also does not consist of particles.My solution to the Bohr problem is an exact orbit that conforms to measurements. This solves one of the most important remaining problems of physics, as fully described in my book:"The Birth of an Atom" .It is true that space is not "empty" and that it has electromagnetic properties. In fact, it has viscosity, which is extremely low as I have shown in my fourth book about Planck's theory. It was known long ago that the speed of light in a vacuum is dependent on these electromagnetic properties, which led to the aether theory. Quantum Mechanics, however, is focused on particle theory, and that is the current difficulty in that it neglects electromagnetic fields that exist everywhere. Of what is a particle made? Today's physicists are concentrating on the Higgs Boson, which they believe constitutes the hidden matter of the universe, rather than the electromagnetic properties of matter. If so, then how is it related to the speed of light and the electromagnetic constants upon which it depends? The Higgs Boson reference asserts that it "casts a shadow", which means that it impedes radiation. If it impedes radiation, then how is it that all radiation passes through a vacuum without loss? It seems that particle theory has significant difficulties and many unanswered questions. My approach concentrates on the electromagnetic properties of the universe, and no such flaws have yet been found.

In my fourth book about Planck's theory, I was able to derive a dynamic portrayal of a quantum of energy that results from the

using a pure electromagnetic model of the atom, similar to that of Planck. You will find anything like this anywhere else that is based on substantial evidence. My solutions are all based on real solutions and correlation to accepted data.change in state of an atomDid you know that the

transverse propertiesof electromagnetic waves and light have never been completely defined? This fundamental problem has remained for two centuries. I have shown that transverse electromagnetic waves travelfaster than the speed of light! The electric wave of a dipole antenna moves across the antenna, while the radial wave is orthogonal to it. This discrepancy in theory has long been neglected. By using the known model of the radiation from an antenna and rewriting the equation constants in proper form, the plots of the radiating waves show transverse properties never before recognized, even though confirmed by early measurements. This new eigenvector characterization of transverse wave properties has great potential for advancing the basic knowledge of physics. Note that all present physics model of radiation indicate purespherical waves. In fact Einstein's theory of relativity is based on this flawed assumption, so there are deep implications as to the value of this revelation. Note that the radiationmodel that I have used has been proved over and over during the past 77 years. Why didn't anyone notice this before? This is a mystery itself.

How isMatter Formedin the Universe? How do an electron and a proton combine to form a hydrogen atom? For many years, it was believed that a barrier surrounds the proton in an atom which prevents the electron from crashing into it, which presents a dilemma. The amazing answer to this problem can be found in this book. Based on the electromagnetic effects of a moving electron as outlined by Planck, the electron moves in a new and different way (so small that it has not yet been detected) to avoid the proton! The importance of this discovery should not be underestimated.The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle asserts that the position and velocity of high energy particles cannot be measured accurately in a single measurement. Although essentially true, it is indeed possible to make such measurements accurately. We know that every single measurement of each and every type and in every field of endeavor has such inaccuracies, but there are known ways to make them accurate as we apply the methods of classical electronic analysis. Learn the

characterization methodthat yields the "certainty" at this link.I spent two full years in studying Planck's quantum theory and ended up writing a book on Planck's Columbia Lectures . This is a great book for any scientist, and is well worth reading about Planck's scientific methods. See why and how Planck used the

as his model for the atom. This is the same approach that I used in the analysis of the gravitational force. For the first time, you will see a graphic illustration of a photon in real time as derived from Planck's rarely referenced "energy state equation", that you will find in any other Internet search. The language translation of Planck's lectures are not very clear, and the interpretation of the constants and variables results inconfusion for each lecture, an my interpretations help in understanding the material. Also check out the Planck's Units page to see why the gravitational constant is not needed (based on Planck's later writings about universal units). Planck's second lecture could be the basis of a great college chemistry course, since he derived many of the laws of physics from mainlyelectronic oscillatortwo equations! Quite amazing.Viewers may also want to begin by seeing an example of the surprising great force between electrons and protons in working out an example of the so-called weak force of atomic physics (separate electrons and protons and see the force between them).Those who try to solve the puzzle of the shape of the dynamic wave of a moving dipole will also discover a new insight as to the shapes of dynamic field waves, from which it is possible to visualize these characteristics. I was quite surprised to learn how many physicists are not fully versed in being able to determine the isoclines of the electric dipole static field. Unless one knows this in detail, it is not possible to determine what happens to the field shape as the dipole moves. I challenge anyone who believes otherwise to solve this moving dipole puzzle.

No visitor has yet offered a solution to this problem!Be the first to offer a reasonable solution and win a free book and see the precise solution that will give you a greater insight as to how transverse waves move through space. These waves are based on the well known antenna radiation equation. Too bad no one seems to have plotted the waves before or derived the eigenvector equation!In addition to the significant accomplishments listed above, you will be able to find the method by which you can calculate the logarithm of a number without a calculator or a table of logarithms! This can be very valuable for electronic engineers, radio amateurs, etc. or anyone else working with logarithms. All you have to do is remember one number, and you can calculate any logarithm, or decibel value, to within a small degree of error.

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle asserts that the position of fast moving particles cannot be measured accurately. According to quantum mechanics, the more precisely the determination of the position of a particle, the less precisely its momentum is, or vice versa. As a result, the quantum mechanics model of the hydrogen atom offers only an approximation of the position of the electron. Is this principle always valid, or is the Heisenberg Principle flawed?

Science Blog Site. An excellent science blog site.

Swarm Knowledge A great web site for interaction with scientists!

Dr.Vlasak's
Favorite Spor*t *Support the sport of fencing!

"Noise in Black and White" For a description of thermal noise with illustrations.

"The
Miraculous Engine"* *An engine that operates at very low temperatures
and is highly efficient.

"A Different
Picture of Radiation" This paper was presented at the IEEE Antennas and
Propagation Society International Symposium 2003**. ** Computer simulated
graphs of transverse electromagnetic waves illustrate the true nature of radiating
waves. These electromagnetic waves travel in both radial and the transverse
directions through space, and the transverse wave moves faster than the speed
of light in the far field. These findings provide contradiction to Einstein's
Relativity theory, which was based on pure * spherical* electromagnetic
radiation (see Einstein quote in above box at left). Electromagnetic radiating
waves are not spherical.

Last updated April 20, 2014

Scientists at MIT have constructed an optical phased array that is similar to the phased array of radar. This appears to be a contradiction to the claims of quantum mechanics that a light wave is particulate.

Dr. Vlasak has a very diverse background and has worked in various companies and in numerous disciplines. He has also been a university professor and owned his own company. You can see a few of the projects that he has worked on at the company website.