from interested visitors, answered by Dr. V.
following series of questions are from a person who has a basic interest
in science and is trying to relate my theory with certain aspects of Einstein's
When the Atom is in a stable state, the electron,
you say, is moving at the speed of light.
But according to the relativistic mass equation,
this would mean it's mass would become infinite.
m goes to infinity as v goes to c.
Since this doesn't happen, what's going on?
This is something that most everyone has overlooked. The transverse mass
goes to zero when the electron travels at the speed of light. Note that
the direction of the velocity of the electron is always transverse to the
radial direction toward the proton.
Well, I have been reading your book; "The Secret of Gravity".
I read through most of it once, then I am going back through it again. I
guess at this point I would begin to think, OK, then what is Electricity?
If everything in this Universe is electrical, then what is the Electric
field and electricity?
Very good question. Electromagnetic fields are generated by electric charges,
static and dynamic. There are only two significant electric charges: the
electron and the proton. These charges are defined by the static fields
that surround them and the forces of attraction between them. Therefore,
it is the electromagnetic field of charges that define the things of greatest
significance in the universe. These electromagnetic force fields have been
well-mapped, and I have tried to supply this explicit information in my
books (the dipolar field and the rotating dipolar field). Similarly, the
forces fields between charges have been well-mapped (the Coulomb force).
In fact, this is exactly what my books are all about.
Then what is an electron and what is a proton? Nuclear physicists spend
most of their time fiddling with the observations of what happens when they
are blasted apart, and they have catalogued hundreds of "sub-particles".
However, the results have not led to much more than additional questions.
In "Secrets of the Atom", I showed that the electron charge is
equal to the inverse of the radian frequency of the electron. Beta rays
have this frequency, which is measurable when electrons are blasted apart.
This suggests that the electron may, itself, be a tiny rotating field of
very high frequency. Using a similar analogy, the proton must then also
be a rotating field of even higher frequency [which it is].
Now we have already gone beyond what is known and believed. The rest is
up to you. Take it from here.
There is one other thing I wanted to share and ask:I sometimes hold an object,
maybe, a rock. Might weigh, 2 lbs. As I hold it, I can feel it's weight,
or the pull of it towards the earth. Yet, I still cannot understand what
this pull is, and what is causing it! I often think about this, just holding
the object and thinking, why does it do this, what is causing this? If Gravity
is Not electrical, what is pulling this
object towards the earth? I already know what Einstein believed about this,
that the curvature of spacetime around the earth causes this geodesic path.
But as you say, this has been formulated by his idea's of analyzing inertia
mass and acceleration. I haven't yet even been able to visualize his reasoning
for why such a spacetime curvature would cause this rock I am holding to
be pulled toward the earth! So, What is causing the Pull towards the earth
on the rock I am holding?
The acceleration of an elevator in space is considered to be an "inertial
force" (F = ma). The gravitational force that is exerted on us at the
surface of the earth is thought to be a static force. Since we are revolving
around the center of the earth once each day, there is an outward inertial
force, and we should be flying out into space. However, the force of gravity
holds to the center of the earth. If we dig a hole and drop into it, we
are being acted on by the gravitational force at 32 ft/sec/sec. Matter and
acceleration do have something in common, by virtue of the equation F =
ma. As you can see by this equation, m = F/a, so the acceleration is inversely
proportional to mass. Dr. Einstein and I part company in regard to his statement
that inertial mass and gravitational mass are equivalent. Nevertheless,
they are related. The curvature of space/time is a theory based on the Lorentz
equations. My interpretation of these equations is somewhat different from
that of Lorentz and Einstein. My theory is based on electrical forces, and
the fields that they create when they move. I have shown that it is the
shape of the field wave that exhibits curvature as it moves through space.
The Minkowski relationship was also misinterpreted by Minkowski and Einstein.
The Minkowki equation falls out of the antenna radiation wave equations,
which is not simply a coincidence.