The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Versus "Characterization"

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle asserts that the position of fast moving particles cannot be measured accurately. According to quantum mechanics, the more precisely the determination of the position of a particle, the less precisely its momentum is, or vice versa. As a result, the quantum mechanics model of the hydrogen atom offers only an approximation of the position of the electron. Is this principle always valid, or is the Heisenberg Principle flawed?

Communications between atoms:

"Quantum information teleported from light to matter (Thursday, October 5, 2006. 1:51 pm (Reuters).Old News! To learn how the atom transmits and sends information, see "Secrets of the Atom" (1999), page 126 and Chap.XI.

You have reached the website of New and Real Science

Watch for a new and important announcement here in early February 2012

This site is unique in adopting the approach that the hydrogen atom is an electronic device. Is this a ridiculous idea? Although not well known, some great scientists of the past have used a similar approach. In fact, quantum theory is based on this concept. Planck's model of the atom (introduced in the year 1900) was an electrical device. My book, The Secret of Gravity, was published in 1999, and it was based on a modern electronic model of the hydrogen atom. This book has been sold around the world, and it has gained some respect. My investigations show that the force of gravity is primarily an electric differential force that is very much lower than the electric forces themselves. But that was just the beginning of my investigations.

Quantum Mechanics is a based on the Bohr hydrogen atom, an abstract electromagnetic model as Bohr himself admitted. In his model, the atom can reach any size, which we know is not possible. In spite of this anomaly, the Bohr atom does conform to measurements of coherent radiation from the hydrogen atom to a high degree and physicists had accepted the Bohr model. Although evem Bohr admitted that his model is abstract, some physicists actually claimed to have detected such atoms! The present Quantum Mechanics atom model was based on an energy shell in order to avoid this orbit problem, so it cannot predict orbits (only inexact probable orbitals). In the New Field Theory presented here, not only is the size problem resolved, the exact electron orbit is also determined. This is a fundamental problem that has never before been solved!

Did you know that the transverse properties of electromagnetic waves and light have never been completely resolved? Were you aware that transverse electromagnetic waves travel faster than the speed of light? This unsolved problem has remained for two centuries. The electromagnetic wave of a dipole entenna moves across the antenna, while the radial wave is orthogonal to it. This discrepancy in theory has long been neglected. By using a known model of the radiation from an antenna and rewriting the equation constants in proper form, the plots of the radiating waves show a transverse properties never before recognized. This new characterization of transverse wave properties have great potential for advancing the basic knowledge of physics. Note that all present physics model of radiation indicate pure spherical waves. In fact Einstein's theory of relativity is based on this assumption.

How is Matter is Formed in the Universe? How do an electron and a proton combine to form a hydrogen atom? For many years, it was believed that a barrier surrounds the proton in an atom which prevents the electron from crashing into it, which presents a dilemma. The answer to this problem can be found in the link at the left.

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle asserts that the position and velocity of high energy particles cannot be measured accurately in a single measurement. Although essentially true, it is indeed possible to make such measurements accurately. We know that every single measurement of each and every type and in every field of endeavor has inaccuracies, but there are known ways to make them accurate as we apply the methods of classical electronic analysis. Learn the method that yields the "certainty" at the above link.

Dr. Vlasak spent two years in studying Planck's quantum theory and ended up writing a book on Planck's Columbia Lectures . This is a great book for any scientist, and is well worth reading about Planck's scientific methods. See why and how Planck used the electronic oscillator as his model for the atom. This is the same approach the Dr. Vlasak used in his analysis of the gravitational force. For the first time, you will see a graphic illustration of a photon in real time as derived from Planck's rarely referenced "energy state equation". The language translation of Planck's lectures are not very clear, and Dr. Vlasak interprets the constants and variables that are so confusing for each lecture. Also check out the Planck's Units page to see why the gravitational constant is not needed (based on Planck's later writings about universal units).

Viewers may also want to begin by seeing an example of the surprising great force between electrons and protons in working out an example of the so-called weak force of atomic physics. Those who try to solve the puzzle of the shape of the dynamic wave of a moving dipole will discover a new insight as to the shapes of dynamic field waves, from which it is possible to visualize these characteristics.

In addition to the significant accomplishments listed above, you will be able to find the method by which you can calculate the logarithm of a number without a calculator or a table of logarithms! Sadly enough, this is our most popular web page. Why in the world are visitors more interested in logarithms than the basic mysteries of science?