You have reached the website of New
and Real Science
and the presentation of new and unique
theories with proofs based on real world measurements
data: QED prediction incorrect
a flaw in the theory is discovered by measurement
2012 CiSE article presents a new electromagnetic model of the atom
that is compatible with QED and measurements
Quantum physics has no answer as to the secret of gravity.
I solved this problem 20 years ago using an electromagnetic model, similar
to Planck's model of the atom (introduced in the year 1900), but I was not
allowed to present it. The famous "Bohr Atom" extended that concept,
which formed the basis of the original quantum physics, but it is an abstract
model. Modern quantum mechanics is a mechanical concept that is still based
on the Bohr model, along with its problems. So I published my first book,
The Secret of Gravity
in 1997, and it was based on a modern electronic model of the hydrogen
atom. My investigations show that the force of gravity is primarily
an electric differential force that is very much lower than the internal
electromagnetic forces of the atom. But that was just the beginning of my
investigations. While my methods conform to reality (measurements) scientists
are now finding various problems with the theorires of quantum mechanics
that often contradict one another or are vague and inaccurate. Other physicists,
however, are beginning to realize that the mechanical/energy models of quantum
mechanics are better solved using classical electromagnetic theory. Read
Where else will you find a derivation of Einstein's theory
E = mc^2 ? I derived it in just one short page ofmy book, "Secrets
of the Atom" (page 64). How? Iused a new
electromagnetic model of the atom to derive its energy. In comparison,
check out the complex and confusing long drawn out mathematical derivations
of quantum mechanics by doing your own Google search.
One of the most challenign problems in physics and science
is the abstract Bohr radius problem. Strangely enough, this problem resulted
in the invention of quantum mechanics in which energy concepts predominate.
Unfortunately, quantum mechanics only produces an approximate "orbital"
for the atom that is based on probabilities that does not conform to the
ever increasing Bohr radii. I have discovered a solution to the Bohr problem,
with an exact orbit, which is the solution to another problem never
It is true that space is not "empty" and that it
has electromagnetic properties. In fact, it has viscosity, which is extremely
low as I have shown in my fourth book about Planck's theory. It was shown
long ago that the speed of light in a vacuum is dependent on these electromagnetic
properties, which led to the aether theory. Quantum Mechanics, however,
is focused on particle theory, and that is the current difficulty in that
it neglects electromagnetic fields that exist everywhere. Of what is a particle
made? Today's physicists are concentrating on the Higgs
Boson, which they believe constitutes the hidden
matter of the universe, rather than the electromagnetic properties of
matter. If so, then how is it related to the speed of light and the electromagnetic
constants upon which it depends? The Higgs Boson reference asserts that
it "casts a shadow", which means that it impedes radiation. If
it impedes radiation, then how is it that all radiation passes through a
vacuum without loss? It seems that particle theory has significant difficulties
and unanswared questions. My approach concentrates on the electromagnetic
properties of the universe, and no such flaws have yet been found.
In my fifth book about Planck's theory, I was able to derive
a dynamic portrayal of a quantum of energy that results from the change
in state of an atom using a pure electromagnetic model of the atom, similar
to that of Planck. I don't think you will find anything like this anywhere
else that is based on substantial evidencel. My solutions are all based
on real solutions and correlation to accepted data.
Quantum Mechanics (a "particle" theory) was based
on the Bohr hydrogen atom, an abstract electromagnetic model as Bohr himself
admitted. In his model, the atom can reach any size, which
we know is not possible. In spite of this anomaly, the Bohr atom does conform
to measurements of coherent radiation from the hydrogen atom to a high degree
and physicists had accepted the Bohr model. Although even Bohr admitted
that his model is abstract, some physicists actually claimed to have detected
such atoms! The present Quantum Mechanics atom model was based on an energy
shell in order to avoid this orbit problem, so it cannot predict
orbits (only inexact probable orbitals). In the new field theory
presented here, not only is the size problem resolved, the precise electron
orbit is also determined. This is a fundamental problem that had
never before been solved. Recent
evidence shows that light also does not consist of particles.
Did you know that the transverse properties of electromagnetic
waves and light have never been completely defined? This fundamental problem
has remained for two centuries. Were you aware that transverse electromagnetic
waves travel faster than the speed of
light? The electromagnetic wave of a dipole antenna moves across
the antenna, while the radial wave is orthogonal to it. This discrepancy
in theory has long been neglected. By using a known model of the radiation
from an antenna and rewriting the equation constants in proper form, the
plots of the radiating waves show transverse properties never before recognized.
This new characterization of transverse wave
properties has great potential for advancing the basic knowledge
of physics. Note that all present physics model of radiation indicate pure
spherical waves. In fact Einstein's theory of relativity is based
on this flawed assumption!
How is Matter Formed in the
Universe? How do an electron and a proton combine to form a hydrogen
atom? For many years, it was believed that a barrier surrounds the proton
in an atom which prevents the electron from crashing into it, which presents
a dilemma. The amazing answer to this problem can be found by checking out
that page. The electron does not move as has been assumed!
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
asserts that the position and velocity of high energy particles cannot be
measured accurately in a single measurement. Although essentially true,
it is indeed possible to make such measurements accurately. We know that
every single measurement of each and every type and in every field of endeavor
has such inaccuracies, but there are known ways to make them accurate as
we apply the methods of classical electronic analysis. Learn the method
that yields the "certainty" at the above link.
Dr. Vlasak spent two full years in studying Planck's quantum
theory and ended up writing a book on Planck's Columbia
Lectures . This is a great book for any scientist, and is well worth
reading about Planck's scientific methods. See why and how Planck used the
electronic oscillator as his model for the atom. This is the
same approach the Dr. Vlasak used in his analysis of the gravitational force.
For the first time, you will see a graphic illustration of a photon in real
time as derived from Planck's rarely referenced "energy state equation"
which I doubt that you will find in any other internet search. The language
translation of Planck's lectures are not very clear, and Dr. Vlasak interprets
the constants and variables that are so confusing for each lecture. Also
check out the Planck's Units page
to see why the gravitational constant is not needed (based on Planck's later
writings about universal units). Planck's second lecture could be the basis
of a great college chemistry course, since he derived many of the laws of
physics from mainly two equations! Where have you seen that before?
Viewers may also want to begin by seeing an example of the surprising
great force between electrons and protons in working out an example of
the so-called weak force of atomic physics,
which serves to illustrate the even weaker force of gravity. Those who
try to solve the puzzle of the shape of the dynamic wave of a moving
dipole will discover a new insight as to the shapes of dynamic field
waves, from which it is possible to visualize these characteristics. I
was quite surprised to learn how many physicists are not fully versed
in being able to determine the isoclines of the electric dipole static
field. Unless one knows this in detail, it is not possible to determine
what happens to the field shape as the dipole moves. I challenge anyone
who believes otherwise to solve this moving dipole puzzle. No one
has yet offered a solution to this problem! Be the first to offer
a reasonable solution and win a free book and see the precise solution
that will give you a greater insight as to how transverse waves move through
space. These waves are based on the well known antenna radiation equation.
Too bad no one seems to have plotted the waves before or derived the eigenvector
In addition to the significant accomplishments listed above, you will
be able to find the method by which you can calculate
the logarithm of a number without a calculator or a table of logarithms!
This can be very valuable for electronic engineers, radio amateurs, etc.
or anyone else working with logarithms. All you have to do is remember
one number, and you can calculate any logarithm, or decibel value, to
within a small degree of erro.